What the recent U.S. elections mean for conservation - SNEWS

What the recent U.S. elections mean for conservation

What Do the November Elections Mean for Conservation?
Author:
Updated:
Original:

Note from the SNEWS editors: As longtime supporters of a number of outdoor nonprofits, we welcome the second of a recurring series of pieces from the Conservation Alliance. We would like to give others in our industry who are fighting the good fight a platform as well. If your organization is interested in contributing, please email us at snewsedit@aimmedia.com.

Check out the Conservation Alliance's earlier column here: "How the industry helped — and will benefit from — San Gabriel's new National Monument Designation."

On Nov. 4, Republicans took control of the U.S. Senate, and added to their majority in the House of Representatives. Since the election, a lot of people have asked me what the election means for conservation. There are so many nuances to this election, that it is impossible to give a clear answer. But here are a few themes that I expect will come into play over the next two years.

  • This election was not a referendum on the environment. Voter turnout was the lowest it’s been since World War II. Only 36.4 percent of eligible voters cast ballots, which is dismal, even for a midterm election. Voters are fed up with Washington, and either stayed home, or voted against President Obama’s party. It has been said from this tiny electorate that few voters cast their ballots to make a statement about conservation and the environment. Quite the opposite. On the state and local levels, voters approved 35 measures to fund a record $13 billion in conservation initiatives.
  • Republicans must now govern. Now that the Republicans control both houses of Congress, they need to shift from obstruction to governing. After four years of near-total gridlock, Republicans have the opportunity to pass legislation, and demonstrate that they actually stand for something. There are dozens of bipartisan conservation bills languishing in the dysfunctional Congress. These bills may now have a better chance of moving. The likely new chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, Rep. Rob Bishop, is known as a dealmaker, and he is developing an ambitious bill that could protect more than one million acres of Wilderness in eastern Utah.
  • More gridlock on climate change. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will soon be chaired by Sen. James Inhofe, who has called climate change a “hoax.” Don’t expect any climate change legislation to land on President Obama’s desk.
  • President Obama will exercise his veto power and executive authority. The president may have to use his veto power to stop any anti-environmental legislation that makes it through Congress. But, more likely, he will seek solutions to environmental issues through executive action. Obama already has reached deal with China to cut carbon emissions. Over the next two years, expect President Obama to designate more National Monuments, especially areas that have been proposed for Congressional protection.
  • All eyes on 2016. Republicans face a tough election in 2016, defending 24 Senate seats, while the Democrats defend only 10. Turnout in that presidential election will be much higher, which generally favors Democrats. Conventional wisdom says that Democrats likely will reclaim a majority in the Senate. But if Republicans run a strong presidential candidate, they could hold on to Congress, and win the White House. Regardless of your political leanings, if you care about conservation and the environment, recent history says that you should dread Republican control of Congress and the White House.

Elections matter, and we will soon learn just how much this one means for conservation.

--John Sterling, the Conservation Alliance

Related

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Photo from Wikimedia Commons.

The Bundy takeover: What does it mean for conservation?

From Fox News to the Salt Palace aisles, this week has been rife with chatter about an obscure bird sanctuary and the 20 self-proclaimed liberators who’re staging a heavily armed takeover there. But conservation advocates at ORWM say that much of the TV discussion of Malheur ...read more

ORD18_Polis_lunch_NC_03

The post-election playbook

Varying levels of excitement, hope, and anxiety reached fever pitch last week as Americans went to the polls in record numbers for what many considered to be an extremely consequential election. With the fate of public lands, climate change action, tariffs, and more in the ...read more

conservation-alliance

The Conservation Alliance: Help Obama, Jewell protect the Arctic Refuge

The following is a guest column from The Conservation Alliance. Got an opinion to share with our readers? Pitch your idea to our edit team at snewsedit@aimmedia.com After receiving more than one million public comments requesting stronger protections for America’s iconic Arctic ...read more

cp

Ibex Outdoor Clothing’s Chelsea Pawlek Elected to The Conservation Alliance Board

WHITE RIVER JUNCTION, VT. (June 12, 2015) —Ibex Outdoor Clothing’s Supply Chain Manager, Chelsea Pawlek, has been elected to the board of directors of The Conservation Alliance. Pawlek has been with Ibex for nearly five years, during which time she has been an active volunteer ...read more

ConservationAllianceLogo7

The Conservation Alliance: Industry presenting greatest unified voice for public land protection in decades

It’s a simple fact that our population is growing and the amount of open space is shrinking. America’s landscapes provide vast opportunities to recreate outside, and these opportunities are what attracted most of us to a career in the outdoor industry. More than ever before, ...read more

VibramFiveFingersSettlement

What Vibram’s proposed FiveFingers settlement means to outdoor/fitness brands

Vibram has filed a $3.75 million settlement offer to end a 2012 class-action lawsuit alleging it wrongly promoted health benefits from its FiveFingers footwear. If approved, customers could file claims to get back up to $94 — but most likely between $20 and $50 — per pair of ...read more

SNEWS Reader Survey -- don't get left out! Let us know what you think about the recent election's effect on your business

Since we sent out the call for responses to our SNEWS® Reader Survey on Nov. 5, the replies have been pouring in. But we still want to hear from you! With a groundbreaking U.S. election just over and President-elect Barack Obama already pondering his transition team and staff ...read more

ORWM15_BruceBabbitt_ConservationAllianceBreakfast

Former U.S. Secretary of the Interior: It's time to wake the outdoor industry's 'sleeping giant'

Throughout the next month, SNEWS will recap its coverage of Outdoor Retailer Winter Market 2015 with select stories from the O.R. Daily we published at the show Jan. 20 – 24. It’s an opportunity for you to catch up on stories you might have missed in O.R.D., and for us to update ...read more

Land and Water Conservation Fund

Conservation Alliance: To save our land and water, call a Congressperson

As the federal government prepares to dole out millions for conservation projects throughout the states and territories, and considers permanently authorizing future funding, the Conservation Alliance is urging the outdoor industry to tell legislators this is priority for the ...read more