Flex Fitness $16.3 million verdict stayed for now

A $16.3 million jury verdict in July against Flex Fitness stemming from a personal injury lawsuit was stayed by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge Aug. 26 until appeal rights expire in late October.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

A $16.3 million jury verdict in July against Flex Fitness stemming from a personal injury lawsuit was stayed by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge Aug. 26 until appeal rights expire in late October.

Meanwhile, Flex Fitness founder Mark Nalley told SNEWS the company is waiting on any additional legal action it is considering against its insurance company for bad faith representation to first see what the insurance company, Atlantic Mutual, decides regarding an appeal.

In the case, Harold Leon Bostick, then 31 and a first-year law student, had sued Flex in April 2001, charging that a defective and dangerous design on the company's Smith machine in the Gold's Gym in Venice Beach, Calif., caused him to have a crushing spinal injury and be rendered a quadriplegic. A jury in a Los Angeles Superior Court awarded Bostick $16,274,966 in damages after a 23-day trial that concluded July 25. An additional punitive phase concluded July 28, awarding $1.

Nalley had charged untruths in a press release that was circulated after the verdict by the plaintiff's attorneys, while Steven Smith, the plaintiff's attorney with Smith, Chapman & Campbell, had told SNEWS that none of the allegations by Nalley or Flex mattered since the jury had spoken. Both sides alleged lies by the other side during and after the trial and verdict. (See SNEWS story from July 31, 2003.)

In the hearing Aug. 26, the judge and attorneys met for clarification on the verdict. At the time the judge stayed the payment to allow both sides and the insurance company time to read transcripts and to consider their appeal options.

Nalley had told SNEWS that insurance companies are bound by law to protect their clients, and if a verdict is higher than the company's policy (in this case, $1 million) and the insurance company declined to discuss an earlier settlement, it could be responsible for any payment, not Flex. Smith did not return several phone calls prior to deadline.

Although the case has been a wake-up call to the industry to be more aware of posting warnings and instructions on equipment, Nalley said that didn't help his company.

"We did learn that the education that's posted on these machines," he said, "is virtually worthless."

Related

Flex_600.jpg

Flex Fitness alleges lies in released verdict info, plans legal action

Slammed by worried customers' calls and appalled by alleged lies in a press release issued by attorneys for the plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit it lost, defendant Flex Fitness told SNEWS it has met with its attorneys and will counter with its own legal actions in the wake ...read more

Flex Fitness $16.3 million injury case not over yet

In an interesting twist on a personal injury lawsuit that resulted in a $16.3 million jury verdict last year against Flex Fitness, Flex founder and defendant Mark Nalley has joined with the plaintiff and the gym where the incident happened as plaintiffs against Flex's insurance ...read more

CybexLogo.jpg

Cybex receives delisting notice as it readies to appeal $66 million jury verdict

Cybex International has received a mandatory notice from the Nasdaq exchange where it trades (CYB), noting it has fallen below the standards to remain listed. The stock price has sunk below the Nasdaq’s minimum of $1 for 30 consecutive days -- a plunge taken immediately following ...read more

CybexLogo.jpg

Cybex post-trial motions don’t convince judge to change $66 million verdict; appeal process starts as business continues

Cybex is preparing its appeal of the $66 million jury verdict against it in a product liability lawsuit. The appeal of the Dec. 7, 2010, ruling should be formally filed with the appellate division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in 30 days or less, COO Art Hicks ...read more

CybexLogo.jpg

Jury verdict against Cybex reduced to $44 million

A New York appeals court has reduced a near $66 million jury verdict faced by fitness equipment manufacturer Cybex to $44 million. The ruling by the Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in the case of Natalie Barnhard vs. ...read more

Fitness financials: Cybex ruled liable in $66 million jury verdict, plus Forzani Group, Costco, Iconix

Cybex ruled liable in $66 million jury verdict A jury has ruled against Cybex Int’l (Nasdaq: CYBI) in a product liability lawsuit that left a New York woman paralyzed, awarding her nearly $66 million after an eight-week jury trial -- an award that could bankrupty if it stands, an ...read more

Cybex to appeal $66 million jury verdict against the company

MEDWAY, MA, December 8, 2010 – Cybex International, Inc. (NASDAQ: CYBI), a leading manufacturer of premium exercise equipment, reported today that a $66,000,000 jury verdict has been rendered in the product liability litigation, Barnhard v. Cybex International, Inc.The verdict ...read more

Cybex loses appeal of $2.5 million judgment in Kirila case

In a case that has dragged around the courts for nearly a decade, Cybex lost its appeal of a jury verdict that had awarded plaintiff and former Pyramid Fitness owner Gene Kirila $2.5 million in damages, fees and penalties. The company, based in Medway, Mass., said it would ...read more

CybexLogo.jpg

Did you hear?... Cybex CEO in shareholder letter tells of ‘sense of injustice’ in $66M verdict against firm

On Dec. 13, Cybex CEO John Aglialoro sent an open letter to shareholders and also posted it on the company website explaining his company’s position on the recent $66 million jury verdict against the company. In it, Aglialoro explained what he called a “sense of injustice” the ...read more