Yakima Products adds Hollywood and Rocky to a growing list of alleged patent infringers

In addition to the two lawsuits against Saris and Inno that SNEWS® reported on Nov. 19, Yakima Products filed two more lawsuits in the Oregon District Court, also on Nov. 13, alleging patent infringement against Hollywood Racks based in Los Angeles, Calif., and Rocky Mounts of Boulder, Colo.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

In addition to the two lawsuits against Saris and Inno that SNEWS® reported on Nov. 19 (click here to read), Yakima Products filed two more lawsuits in the Oregon District Court, also on Nov. 13, alleging patent infringement against Hollywood Racks based in Los Angeles, Calif., and Rocky Mounts of Boulder, Colo.

As is the case with Saris and Inno, Yakima is alleging that Hollywood (www.hollywoodracks.com) is infringing on its 5,056,700, 6,431,423, 6,467,664, and 6,840,418 patents by manufacturing and selling bicycle carriers and assemblies including the Traveler and Road Runner (both hitch-mounted racks), and the Baja and F6 Expedition (both trunk-mounted racks). The patents at issue for Rocky Mounts are U.S. Patents 6,494,351 and 6,851,590. Yakima alleges in court documents that Rocky (www.rockymounts.com) is infringing on the patents by manufacturing and selling bicycle carriers and assemblies including the Rocky Mounts disc adapter (www.rockymounts.com/discadapter).

Yakima is seeking compensation for lost profits, royalties for use of patents, attorney fees, and an injunction preventing further infringement from both Hollywood and Rocky.

--Michael Hodgson

SNEWS® View: With the addition of two more lawsuits, and it remains to be seen if there will be any subsequent ones, it appears Yakima is conducting a methodical review of a number of its patents as it conducts an internal assessment of its intellectual property. As a result of this review, it appears Yakima has found cause to go after four companies over six patents. Why you might ask? From a legal perspective, that's easy. A patent has no value unless the patent holder is willing to defend it -- no different than a trademark. From an investment standpoint, Yakima's parent company, Arcapita, hung onto Yakima after divesting itself of Watermark (click here to read our SNEWS story) in 2005. Yakima was acquired in 2001 and is now one of Arcapita's older companies in the portfolio. Considering five years is about the limit for hanging onto an investment in a typical case, one has to believe Yakima is now also seeking to ensure it is worth as much as possible to future buyers -- and keeping patents valuable is one way to do just that.

Naturally, Yakima's legal team is probably very happy at the billable hours. And the lawyers for the defendants will also be thrilled with the new work coming their way. We're not sure the defendants are very happy, however, and would expect statements to be issued if any or all find the Yakima allegations to be without merit.

--SNEWS Editors

Related

Yakima Products sues Saris Cycling and Inno Advanced Car Racks on same day

Yakima Products filed two lawsuits in the Oregon District Court on Nov. 13, alleging patent infringement against two different companies: Inno Advanced Car Racks (a Car Mate USA company) based in Torrance, Calif., and Saris Cycling Group of Madison, Wis. The patents at issue ...read more

Woolrich_Logo.jpg

Woolrich sues Eddie Bauer for alleged trademark infringement

Woolrich, along with John Rich & Sons Investment Holding Company, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Eddie Bauer in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Jan. 6. Woolrich is alleging that Eddie Bauer is infringing on its trademark "The ...read more

Wolverine sues Harbor and Kohl's alleging Merrell-brand patent infringement

In a move that Wolverine Outdoor Group President Jacques Lavertue told SNEWS® was intended to "definitively protect the design patents and brand integrity of the Merrell brand," Wolverine World Wide (NYSE: WWW) filed a patent infringement suit against Harbor Footwear Group and ...read more

Avocet Sports Technology files patent infringement lawsuit against Suunto and Amer

Avocet Sports Technology and Vertical Instruments, both based in Northern California, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Amer Sports and its subsidiary, Suunto USA, for alleged patent infringement. The lawsuit, filed on ...read more

EK patent infringement lawsuit against Chisco takes a curious turn

On March 28, SNEWS® received a notification email from EK Ekcessories announcing the company had filed a lawsuit on March 18, 2005, in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah against Chisco Sports Accessories for alleged patent infringement of the company's utility and ...read more

Precor sues Fitness Quest, Sportcraft claiming patent infringement

Precor will be giving the courts a little more to do in the coming months. Along with its licensor, Larry Miller, Precor has filed two patent infringement suits against both Fitness Quest and Sportcraft for allegedly infringing on its 10-year-old elliptical patent. “While we ...read more

Nautilus sues Keys for alleged indoor cycle infringement

A complaint filed Dec. 22 in the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Nautilus Inc. alleges Keys Fitness has infringed several patents owned by Nautilus related to indoor exercise bikes. The complaint, which requests a jury trial, stated that Keys infringed on three ...read more

Lockwood Sues Web-based Retailers for Patent Infringement

PanIP LLC has filed suit against 11 retailers, alleging that each is in violation of patents owned by Lawrence Lockwood that govern how commercial and financial transactions are done on the Web. The suits were filed on March 28, 2002, in the U.S. District Court, Southern District ...read more

FreeMotion takes alleged imitators to task

With two patent-infringement lawsuits pending, FreeMotion Fitness has said it will now aggressively pursue alleged imitators of its functional cable arm technology that it initially rolled out nearly four years ago. Legal challenges are pending against Cybex International and The ...read more