The North Face plans 15 percent reduction in SKUs by fall 2013; Adidas targets 25 percent cuts

The North Face and Adidas plan to decrease the number of products they make. Find out why officials are planning the cuts at a time of growth. Plus, weigh in: Which products should stay — and which should go?

In business, growth is generally thought as a good thing — sell more, make more.

Growing companies, such as those in the outdoor industry, are able to expand their ideas into new product categories to further fuel gains, leverage supply chains and increase margins. See Black Diamond expanding into apparel, or Nemo getting into sleeping bags.

But when you get to be the size of The North Face or Adidas, all that growth can get out of hand. Suddenly there are too many SKUs for both manufacturer and retailer to track. Adidas has more than 47,000 different products, officials said. Brand’s resources, instead of being capitalized, get spread thin. Not to mention hundreds of styles and colors go out of fashion with every passing year, if not season.

So, despite The North Face and Adidas reporting strong first-quarter 2012 earnings and a lot more growth, officials with both brands said cuts are ahead in number of different products they make.

“In an effort to meet our consumer demand and better focus our presentation at retail, we're implementing a global product line rationalization program with the goal of reducing SKUs [at The North Face] by 15 percent by fall 2013,” said Steve Rendle, outdoor group president at the brand’s parent firm VF Corp., on the company's conference call.

A similar message came from Adidas CEO Herbert Hainer, who told German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in early April that he plans for a 25 percent cut in product styles.

"We just have too many products," Hainer said. He added that 20 percent of Adidas’ products account for 80 percent of the company’s sales.

Both Hainer and Rendle said the reductions at their respective companies would lead to more efficiency and higher margins.

But before you stand and salute these words of wisdom, remember that executives are infamous for sugarcoating almost every move. In more blunt terms, both brands are saying they have a chunk of products that just aren’t selling well, or aren’t pulling in the right margins.

Still, one of the reasons The North Face and Adidas likely are so successful, is that they know when it’s time to cut the dead weight.

--David Clucas

Weigh in below or on Facebook: Which TNF or Adidas products should stay, which should go?



The North Face focuses on footwear

The North Face has staked its reputation on apparel and gear, and now its footwear department is catching up. The company started developing footwear in 2006, but during the last year TNF has committed to reinvigorating the department with new hires and restructuring it to mirror more


The North Face Kishtwar jacket

Ever since soft shell garments were introduced, people have struggled to define the category, though it’s generally agreed that soft shells are typically water-resistant, somewhat soft to the touch, highly breathable, and relatively stretchy. Because soft shells are so more

The North Face bringing footwear R&D in-house

While at Summer Market, SNEWS® learned, and Steve Rendle, president of The North Face confirmed, that the company is pushing the growth of its footwear category by creating a new and separate footwear department in-house. Its footwear division will act as a separate department more