Nautilus, Icon settle all remaining infringement battles out-of-court

In one fell swoop, the nearly five-year legal wrangling in two courts in two states between Nautilus Inc. and Icon Health & Fitness were ended when Nautilus announced an out-of-court settlement of all outstanding intellectual property litigation.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

In one fell swoop, the nearly five-year legal wrangling in two courts in two states between Nautilus Inc. and Icon Health & Fitness were ended when Nautilus announced an out-of-court settlement of all outstanding intellectual property litigation.

Details of the settlement were confidential; however, it's no secret that each company has spent many millions on the suits, trials and appeals. Nautilus (NYSE: NLS) alone estimated that the settlement will save the company about $1.5 million just this year, spokesman Ron Arp told SNEWS®.

In the 10-K filed by Nautilus with the SEC for the 2005 year, the company noted that a 57.3 percent increase in general and administrative expenses over 2004 (from $31 million to $48.8 million, or from 5.9 percent of net sales to 7.7 percent of net sales) was "primarily due to increased legal fees of approximately $5.7 million mostly related to litigation with Icon…."

"We're pleased that it's settled," said Icon's Colleen Logan, the only statement available from the company based in Logan, Utah, which had launched the first volley in August 2002 with a lawsuit against Nautilus charging trademark infringement, among other details.

Nautilus confirmed to SNEWS® that it would now be licensing intellectual property from Icon but would not be paying licensing fees. Icon had no comment on its arrangements as of April 27. Other financial details of the settlement remained confidential.

"We decided that this was a good alternative to several more years of litigation," said Arp, senior vice president, corporate communications. "We mediated receiving access to significant intellectual property that will be helpful to our business; we have access to more intellectual property that will be important as we further develop our strategic position in the marketplace."

The companies, which have sparred over patents and trademarks, some of which included the now-expired Bowflex patent, began settlement negotiations in September 2006, just before the trademark portion of the case brought by Nautilus against Icon in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, was to begin, with a requested outcome of a jury trial.

The patent infringement portion of the same case, brought by Nautilus in December 2002 as one suit but separated into two by the court, was ultimately won by Icon when Nautilus lost a federal appeal in August 2006 of the November 2005 judgment. The settlement of the case, which had charged infringement of the Bowflex, among other things, ultimately cost Nautilus close to $8.2 million.

The other case was a second one brought by Icon against Nautilus in September 2006 in the U.S. District Court, District of Utah, that charged patent infringement.

Another previously settled trademark infringement case, brought in July 2004 by Nautilus against Icon concerning the new Icon name, Crossbar, adopted by Icon for its Crossbow, was settled out-of-court in late 2004 and was not a part of this agreement.

SNEWS® View: Ultimately, it's a glorious day to see many millions of dollars stop flowing into lawyers' pockets and legal coffers when it can be better spent on equipment development, fitness promotion and retailer programs, among other things. It's only a sad state that it took almost five years to get to this point.

Related

U.S. court dismisses Nautilus' patent infringement case against Icon

After racking up a majority of the legal wins in the past, Nautilus came up short this week when a U.S. court dismissed all remaining claims in its pending patent infringement case against Icon less a month before charges were to go to trial, effectively ending the case. The ...read more

Nautilus/Icon infringement battles wage on: Nautilus takes upper hand in preliminary arguments in Washington case

As the two behemoth fitness companies Nautilus and Icon spend millions of dollars a year on several patent and trademark infringement legal battles, Nautilus seems to have gained an upper hand in one suit it brought against Icon in December 2002, even though Nautilus lost its bid ...read more

Nautilus wins federal appeal in Icon trademark infringement battle

Taking nearly a year for a decision, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled in favor of The Nautilus Group on a July 2003 appeal and granted the company a preliminary injunction in its case against Icon that charges trademark infringement of ...read more

Icon wins another round in Nautilus patent infringement battle

In a continuing volley in the legal battle over patent infringement, Icon Health & Fitness picked up another point when a district court last week granted the company a motion that means the court has found the Icon-made Crossbow machine is not substantially similar to the ...read more

Icon, Nautilus file court briefs on Icon's victory in trademark infringement case

Icon and Nautilus have filed lengthy briefs with the U.S. District Court, District of Utah, with each company stating its side one last time before the judge in the case finalizes the $7.8 million jury verdict handed down in Icon's favor. The case was filed by Icon against ...read more

Nautilus loses federal appeal of Icon victory in patent infringement case

Icon's legal victory in a patent infringement case brought against it by Nautilus nearly four years ago was affirmed by the federal court when that court declined to hear the ruling by the lower court. On Aug. 21, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, ...read more

Nautilus appeals Icon non-infringement legal victory to federal court

Not willing to give up on the nearly 3-year-old patent infringement case, Nautilus has appealed the lower court victory given to Icon in late May to the federal appellate court. After the win was handed to Icon in May when the court dismissed the case (click here to see the ...read more

Court dismisses Nautilus patent case against Icon

Already having knocked down wins in the last few court rounds, Icon Fitness took the TKO in the legal battle brought by Nautilus charging patent infringement on the Bowflex by Icon's Crossbow when the district court dismissed the case last week. "It's done, for all intents and ...read more

Nautilus and Icon fire paper volleys in ongoing legal battles

Several ongoing legal feuds between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness charging infringements and false advertising have escalated into what seems like the equivalent of paper-wad wars as both companies fired out public statements that infuriated and frustrated the ...read more