Icon wins stay on prelim injunction in Nautilus legal battle

Icon Health & Fitness has won a stay from a federal appellate court on a preliminary injunction Nautilus had only finalized two days earlier that would have kept Icon from marketing, selling or advertising its Crossbow at least until a December trial.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

Icon Health & Fitness has won a stay from a federal appellate court on a preliminary injunction Nautilus had only finalized two days earlier that would have kept Icon from marketing, selling or advertising its Crossbow at least until a December trial.

With legal maneuvers flying so fast, observers were left feeling as if they were watching a bi-coastal tennis game -- don't blink or you'll miss a volley -- Nautilus and Icon now must prepare a response for the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., by Aug. 11. At the same time, both companies will prepare for a trial in the trademark infringement case, now scheduled to begin Dec. 1 in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, in Seattle, Wash.

After the responses are filed, the federal court could either decide the stay is appropriate and leave it in place until the trial in Seattle, it could lift the stay and allow the preliminary injunction, or it could schedule a hearing before it makes a decision, Brad Bearnson, Icon legal counsel, told SNEWS. He said the federal court will look at the possibility of "irreparable harm" to Icon if the injunction were to stay in place.

"We're confident of our position, and we're anxious to get this matter heard before the appellate court," Bearnson added.

Nautilus President Kevin Lamar told SNEWS: "We certainly expected (the stay), and it does not surprise us at all. It is exactly what we would do if the situations were reversed. We still believe we will be very successful with our claims."

The case dates back to November 2002 when The Nautilus Group filed a suit against Icon in which Nautilus charged Icon with trademark infringement and literal patent infringement on its Bowflex machine by Icon's Crossbow by Weider machine, which was introduced in October 2002. In May, Icon won the first round in the legal squirmish when Nautilus was denied a preliminary injunction for literal patent infringement and Judge Marsh Pechman of the Seattle court also granted partial summary judgment to Icon on several claims of literal infringement therefore avoiding trial on those. To win a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must show it has a good chance of winning at trial.

On July 14, Nautilus won its request for a preliminary injunction on claims of trademark infringement, which was finalized by the court on July 30 after Nautilus filed the required bond. In awarding this injunction, the Court concluded that Nautilus showed "a probability of success (at trial) on the merits and irreparable injury" on its trademark infringement claim. That injunction ordered Icon "and anyone acting in concert with Icon" from selling, promoting, marketing or advertising the Crossbow.

Wrote the court in its July 14 granting of the preliminary injunction: "There is no dispute that the parties effectively market the same product -- a resilient rod home exercise machine." The court also wrote: "The use of convergent marketing channels increases the likelihood of confusion."

"We're anticipating going all the way to the mat," Lamar said. "We do have to defend what we created.

"We know the patent expires in April, but until that date, we'll defend it," Lamar added, noting that if the case were decided in Nautilus' favor, damages would go back to when the Crossbow first was sold.

SNEWS View: In neither the case of Icon nor Nautilus does one expect to see out-of-court settlements since both companies tend to want to stand solid when it comes to their products and their beliefs about them. We expect that this case will indeed go to trial -- and an interesting one it could be.

Related

Court rejects Nautilus plea to reinstate Icon prelim injunction

In the ongoing patent and trademark infringement case between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., has rejected Nautilus' argument to lift the stay that Icon won on a preliminary injunction in early August. Filed ...read more

Nautilus loses preliminary injunction in Icon lawsuit

Losing the first round court battle in its lawsuit charging Icon with infringement of its Bowflex patents, The Nautilus Group will appeal a court ruling that denied a preliminary injunction it sought against Icon Health & Fitness. The injunction would have halted Icon's Weider ...read more

Nautilus wins federal appeal in Icon trademark infringement battle

Taking nearly a year for a decision, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled in favor of The Nautilus Group on a July 2003 appeal and granted the company a preliminary injunction in its case against Icon that charges trademark infringement of ...read more

Icon wins another round in Nautilus patent infringement battle

In a continuing volley in the legal battle over patent infringement, Icon Health & Fitness picked up another point when a district court last week granted the company a motion that means the court has found the Icon-made Crossbow machine is not substantially similar to the ...read more

Nautilus and Icon fire paper volleys in ongoing legal battles

Several ongoing legal feuds between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness charging infringements and false advertising have escalated into what seems like the equivalent of paper-wad wars as both companies fired out public statements that infuriated and frustrated the ...read more

Nautilus vs. Icon infringement fisticuffs goes another round

Nautilus and Icon are now expected to go to jury trial later this year in the patent infringement case brought by Nautilus in December 2002 that charges the Crossbow infringes on the Bowflex. Although a district court last October dismissed the patent case brought by Nautilus ...read more

Nautilus says Icon in contempt of court for continued Crossbow sales

Alleging that Icon has allowed retailers to continue to sell its product called Crossbow in violation of a June 2004 preliminary court injunction against it, Nautilus has asked the court to hold Icon in contempt of court. In response, Icon filed a proposed court order on Dec. 28 ...read more

Nautilus appeals Icon non-infringement legal victory to federal court

Not willing to give up on the nearly 3-year-old patent infringement case, Nautilus has appealed the lower court victory given to Icon in late May to the federal appellate court. After the win was handed to Icon in May when the court dismissed the case (click here to see the ...read more

Nautilus/Icon infringement battles wage on: Nautilus takes upper hand in preliminary arguments in Washington case

As the two behemoth fitness companies Nautilus and Icon spend millions of dollars a year on several patent and trademark infringement legal battles, Nautilus seems to have gained an upper hand in one suit it brought against Icon in December 2002, even though Nautilus lost its bid ...read more