How Octane Fitness won a U.S. Supreme Court case to help curb frivolous lawsuits

Fresh off a win at the U.S. Supreme Court, SNEWS talks to Octane President Dennis Lee on what might amount to a legacy of fewer frivolous lawsuits.

It’s not every day that the fitness industry finds itself before the U.S. Supreme Court.

But after six years of rulings and appeals, Octane Fitness is one step closer to coming out on top in a patent lawsuit brought against it by Icon Health & Fitness in 2008.

In reality, Octane won the patent case in U.S. District courts back in 2012. But after having to spend $1.8 million in attorney’s fees to defend itself throughout the saga, it petitioned the lower courts to have Icon (the losing party) reimburse those costs based on the alleged frivolous and unreasonable nature of the patent lawsuits.

“To have someone come forward and sue us on something that had no chance of winning was frustrating,” Octane President and CEO Dennis Lee told SNEWS. “We won every step of the way and they kept appealing. The time, money and energy spent on this should have gone toward our product innovation and growth, not legal fees.”

Icon had sued Octane on two separate patents, one concerning heart rate monitoring technology, the other about a mechanical link on ellipticals. “The heart rate claim was so unreasonable that Icon was forced to drop it from the case early in the litigation, and Octane won on the linkage issue,” Lee said.

While the lower courts ruled in Octane’s favor that it did not infringe on Icon’s patents, they denied Octane’s claim that the lawsuits were “exceptional” enough to have the losing party pay winner’s legal fees. The finding was based on laws in place to protect real victims of crimes, no matter their economic standing, so that they don’t feel financially deterred to file a case.

The debate over the law is how the case landed in the Supreme Court. Octane argued that the law had become a "rigid and virtually insurmountable test," and that trial judges should be able to award fees when a patent holder “unreasonably pursues a case having an objectively low likelihood of success” to serve as a deterrent to litigation abuse via groundless lawsuits.

After hearing the case in February, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously agreed with Octane in early May. The decision will send the case back to the lower courts, where district judges will have increased leeway to rule on legal fee reimbursement with a “preponderance (an abundance of quality) of the evidence,” versus just “clear and convincing evidence.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, "A case presenting either subjective bad faith or exceptionally meritless claims may sufficiently set itself apart from mine-run cases to warrant a fee award."

The decision goes beyond the fitness industry. Fifteen amicus briefs were filed in support of Octane’s petition, including one by the United States Solicitor General’s Office.

“We are thrilled to be in the position of helping relieve the burden of meritless lawsuits on businesses across all industries with this historic decision,” Lee said.

The final chapter for Octane is slated to come later this year, when the case returns to the district court to reconsider the reimbursement of legal fees under the re-interpreted law.

--David Clucas


U.S. Supreme Court to Review Attorneys' Fees in Octane Fitness Patent Lawsuit

BROOKLYN PARK, Minn. – October 10, 2013 – The United States Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a petition by Octane Fitness, LLC, which is seeking well over $1 million in attorneys’ fees after defeating a patent lawsuit brought by Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. “This is an more

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Octane Fitness on Attorneys’ Fees in Patent Infringement Lawsuit

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  CONTACT: Julie King 847.638.1582 U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Octane Fitness on Attorneys’ Fees in Patent Infringement Lawsuit BROOKLYN PARK, Minn. – May 1, 2014 – The United States Supreme Court on Tuesday more


Icon appeal to court decision about Octane’s noninfringement denied

The saga that started in 2008 when Icon sued Octane and the now-defunct Nellie’s (which was liquidated by owners David and Sandra Delgadillo in 2009) has come to an end. Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Icon’s appeal of the court’s more


Trade-secret lawsuit against Columbia dismissed

A 2012 lawsuit claiming that Columbia Sportswear had violated trade-secret laws to develop its Omni-Heat Electric technology has been dismissed. Innovative Sports Inc. , which filed the suit in March 2012, has “voluntarily dismissed all claims against Columbia and provided more

Octane Fitness Prevails Against Icon in Patent Lawsuit

BROOKLYN PARK, Minn. – Nov. 28, 2012 – The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a recently published opinion, unanimously affirmed a previous ruling by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota rejecting a claim by Icon Health and more


First look: Octane’s Zero Runner aims to evolve low-impact run training

The fleet footed might soon be running to your specialty fitness store. In a bid to bridge the gap between high-impact running on treadmills and the restrictive range-of-motion of ellipticals, Octane plans to change the game with its new and inventive Zero Runner. The fitness more

U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Nike's First Amendment case

Urged by Nike to review a California state court ruling that affects First Amendment protection for companies that speak on public issues, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to "just do it." Nike's troubles began in May 2002 when the California Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that because more


How to help Nepal with donations and outdoor gear

With rescue operations winding down in Nepal after a 7.8-magnitude earthquake killed an estimated 5,000 people, including climbers on Mount Everest, now the long road to recovery begins. Numerous outdoor brands have tight connections to the area, working closely with the local more


Apparent scam targets recorded customer-service calls

While clear of one lawsuit Thursday, Columbia Sportswear faces an unrelated legal claim that the company failed to inform callers to its customer service line that their conversations were being recorded. Attorneys on behalf of Talia Hurst of California claim that Columbia more