Crocs wins appeal on patent infringement against Waldies, Dawgs - SNEWS

Crocs wins appeal on patent infringement against Waldies, Dawgs

The U.S. International Trade Commission recently reversed its course on a patent-infringement ruling, giving Crocs Inc. the possibility it might be able to block imports of competing Dawgs and Waldies foam clog footwear. SNEWS is tracking the case.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

The U.S. International Trade Commission recently reversed its course on a patent infringement ruling, giving Crocs Inc. the possibility it might be able to block imports of competing Dawgs and Waldies foam clog footwear.

In 2008, the trade commission in Washington, D.C., had ruled against Niwot, Colo.-based Crocs and its ability to enforce two of its patents against Waldies-maker Effervescent Inc. of Fitchburg, Mass., and Dawgs-maker Double Diamond Distribution Ltd. of Canada.

But a 2010 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling overturned the trade commission ruling and sent the case back to the commission, who passed it to an administrative law judge. In February 2011, the judge ruled that one of the patents – U.S. Patent No. 6,993,858, particularly noting Croc’s foam-pivoting strap -- was enforceable and being infringed upon by Effervescent and Double Diamond.

Lawyers for both Effervescent and Double Diamond argued that Crocs had failed to disclose material -- including proper detail on pre-existing similiar-looking foam clogs -- to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office when applying for the patent and therefore the patent should have never been issued.

The six-member commission received arguments by the companies in March 2011 and decided in late April 2011 not to further review the matter and uphold the judge’s ruling favoring Crocs. The commission requested written remedy submissions from the parties, which were due May 6. Replies to those submissions are due May 13.

Effervescent Inc. attorney Stephen Horace of Lathrop & Gage LLP told SNEWS® the company "disagrees with this decision and believes the ITC had it right the first time it considered this case.” He declined to comment on how the company would move forward.

Crocs officials did not return a request for comment by SNEWS.

Crocs initially filed the patent infringement case in 2006 against 11 companies, including Effervescent and Double Diamond. The other nine companies eventually dropped out of the case on consent order, settlement agreement or the commission’s determination of non-infringement.

--David Clucas

Related

International Trade Commission ruling slaps down Crocs' claims of patent infringement against Waldies and Holey Soles

An April 11 ruling by the presiding administrative law judge of the International Trade Commission has been affirmed, and the ruling now made public, stating that Waldies, Holey Soles and three other footwear manufacturers are not violating Crocs' design patent. In addition, the ...read more

Waldies_AT_Clog.gif

Waldies AT – the original foam clog

Maybe you've heard of Crocs? Well, despite what the company asserts, it is not the original foam clog. Actually, the Waldies brand has the legitimate claim of being first on the block since they appeared in 2001. Back then, Waldies clogs were made in a factory that Crocs later ...read more

USA's Waldies Original Comfy Clogs wins at ITC Court vs Shoe Goliath Crocs!

On July 25, 2008, the United States International Trade Commission Court (ITC) terminatedits investigation of patent infringement made by Crocs against Effervescent Inc., makersof Waldies Comfy Clogs, and ten other companies. The ITC found that Waldies clogs do not infringe any ...read more

Nautilus loses federal appeal of Icon victory in patent infringement case

Icon's legal victory in a patent infringement case brought against it by Nautilus nearly four years ago was affirmed by the federal court when that court declined to hear the ruling by the lower court. On Aug. 21, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, ...read more

Nautilus wins federal appeal in Icon trademark infringement battle

Taking nearly a year for a decision, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled in favor of The Nautilus Group on a July 2003 appeal and granted the company a preliminary injunction in its case against Icon that charges trademark infringement of ...read more

U.S. court dismisses Nautilus' patent infringement case against Icon

After racking up a majority of the legal wins in the past, Nautilus came up short this week when a U.S. court dismissed all remaining claims in its pending patent infringement case against Icon less a month before charges were to go to trial, effectively ending the case. The ...read more

Icon wins another round in Nautilus patent infringement battle

In a continuing volley in the legal battle over patent infringement, Icon Health & Fitness picked up another point when a district court last week granted the company a motion that means the court has found the Icon-made Crossbow machine is not substantially similar to the ...read more

EK patent infringement lawsuit against Chisco takes a curious turn

On March 28, SNEWS® received a notification email from EK Ekcessories announcing the company had filed a lawsuit on March 18, 2005, in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah against Chisco Sports Accessories for alleged patent infringement of the company's utility and ...read more

Outlast Files Infringement Lawsuit Against Frisby … Again.

Outlast Technologies, Inc., a Boulder, Colorado-based company that makes temperature regulation materials for foams and fabrics, filed patent infringement lawsuit in the Federal District Court of Colorado against Salem, N.C.-based Frisby Technologies, Inc., a thermal management ...read more