But e-bike companies counter that misconceptions surround the new bike technology.

A debate reminiscent of the one that preceded opening access for mountain bikers is playing out right now as e-bikes gain a foothold and federal agencies consider policies.

On July 26, more than 50 trail conservancy organizations—such as The Wilderness Society and Colorado Mountain Club—sent a letter to top officials at the U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management asking that they restrict e-bike access on federal public lands. They argue that allowing the pedal-assist bikes anywhere is a "slippery slope" and disrupts people's enjoyment of remote places away from vehicles in addition to damaging the trails and increasing conflicts.

But e-bike companies, including Haibike, owned by Accell Group, have their own reasons why certain types should be allowed on at least some non-motorized trails.

"The pushback is not out of sorts," Accell North America President Larry Pizzi said. He chairs PeopleForBikes' e-bike committee and has been in the bike industry for more than 40 years. "I understand people’s concerns, but I think that there’s a very significant misunderstanding about how these Class 1 pedal-assist e-mountain bikes work."

For the last five years, PeopleForBikes' e-bike committee has helped craft a three-class designation for bikes with pedal-assist systems. As of today, 22 states have adopted the designations into their vehicle codes—a step toward opening e-bike access on some trails. 

Class 1: e-bikes that are pedal-assist only, with no throttle, and have a maximum assisted speed of 20 mph.
Class 2: e-bikes that also have a maximum speed of 20 mph, but are throttle-assisted.
Class 3: e-bikes that are pedal-assist only, with no throttle, and a maximum assisted speed of 28 mph.

Pizzi said PeopleForBikes' commissioned studies have shown that Class 1 pedal-assist bikes have nominal impact on trails compared to non-electric bikes and that other trail users hardly noticed the bikes had a small motor. He said the fears of the mountain biking community and the various wilderness groups are not playing out. 

It's not like they're asking for unfettered access to every trail, such as those with capacity issues or ones that are multi-directional, Pizzi said. But he said fire roads, primitive roads, and certainly paved roads inside federal public land areas should be open for discussion.

"It’s undeniable that they’ve got an electric motor—you can point to it," Pizzi said. "But because of new sensor technology, it is unlike any other motorized vehicle that’s out there. It is truly a human-hybrid kind of a product. That is what, in essence, differentiates it from unfairly being categorized as a motor vehicle."

The full letter about e-bike management on federal public lands

On behalf of our millions of members, supporters and public land users across the country we write to object to any attempt by public land management agencies to legalize electronic motor bikes (e-bikes) on non-motorized trails.

We oppose any effort that would allow any class of vehicle with a motor—including all classes of e-bikes, which by definition have a motor—to be allowed on non-motorized trails. A contrary interpretation would create an unmanageable slippery slope and threaten future management of all non-motorized trails and areas on public lands.

Non-motorized trails were created to ensure that the public could find recreational trail opportunities free from the ever-growing motorization and mechanization. Millions of public land users including hikers, backpackers, hunters, horse packers, climbers, mountain bikers and many more, value non-motorized trails for recreation. Opening non-motorized trails to motors would forever change the backcountry experience for these users.

We recognize that e-bikes have a place on public lands and generally should be allowed where motorized vehicles are permitted. The existing motorized trail system provides plentiful opportunities for e-bike use with tens of thousands of miles of trails currently open to their use.

The Bicycle Products Suppliers Association, international power equipment companies and e-bike user groups, created a classification system for e-bikes, based on motor and battery sizes and engagement systems for the motor.[1] This classification system is confusing for land managers and lawmakers and the bikes themselves are often difficult to distinguish from one another. The fact remains that all e-bikes are motorized by definition, regardless of the size of the motor or how it is turned on.

We understand that federal land management agencies are currently considering policy changes to allow e-bikes on non-motorized trails. Such a policy is ill-advised and would undermine nearly a half century of management precedents and practices. First, allowing e-bikes on non-motorized trails would be un-manageable and send agencies down a slippery slope towards allowing further motorization of trails and potentially the entire backcountry. Federal land managers simply do not have the resources to police e-bikes on trails.

Second, permitting e-bikes on non-motorized trails is contrary to long-standing “travel management” laws and policies dating back to the Nixon administration that require all motorized recreational uses of our public lands to be confined to a system of designated roads, trails, and areas.[2] Among other requirements, motorized trails must be located to minimize conflicts with other recreational uses of the public lands, as well as damage to soil, water, and other public land resources and harassment of wildlife. Separately, agencies are required to manage certain wildlands–including Wilderness Study Areas, Forest Service recommended wilderness, and BLM lands managed for wilderness characteristics–to preserve and protect wilderness character. National Scenic Trails are also required by law to be managed as non-motorized trails. In short, current laws and policies require that non-motorized trails remain non-motorized, and any contrary interpretation could only be supported, if at all, through full notice and comment rulemaking processes.

Millions of public land users across the country enjoy both motorized and non-motorized recreational experiences. Opening non-motorized trails to motorized bikes would effectively eliminate the non-motorized, primitive recreational opportunities. We strongly oppose any effort to change existing trail management rules or policies and encourage all federal land management agencies to reject any effort to open non-motorized trails to e-bikes or other motorized vehicles.

Sincerely,

The Wilderness Society, American Hiking Society, Appalachian Trail Conservancy, Colorado Mountain Club, Quiet Trails Group, and 50 others (full list here)

Related

Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone

Sincerely, the national parks

From outdated facilities to crumbling roads to well-traveled trails, many national parks are in need of facelifts with a total price tag of more than $11.6 billion. In order for generations to come to enjoy the parks' wonders and rejuvenating magic, that maintenance backlog must ...read more