Cobra claims victory, Ocean Kayak says no

After a two-year battle in the courts, Cobra Kayaks issued a press release claiming it had won a victory against Ocean Kayaks over the company's alleged infringement on patents pertaining to the Malibu II kayak seating designs held by Ocean and was "now free to go back to the earlier seating if they so decide."
Author:
Updated:
Original:

After a two-year battle in the courts, Cobra Kayaks issued a press release claiming it had won a victory against Ocean Kayaks over the company's alleged infringement on patents pertaining to the Malibu II kayak seating designs held by Ocean and was "now free to go back to the earlier seating if they so decide."

SNEWS obtained a copy of the January 14 court decision, handed down by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. While the court did find in favor of Cobra on two patent claims, essentially stating that two of four Ocean Kayak's claims are, themselves, invalid, the decision is anything but a victory. In fact, the court stated at the close of its opinion that, "We therefore reverse-in-part and vacate-in-part the district court's grants of summary judgment of validity and infringement. We remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion."

We attempted to get additional commentary from Warren Aitken, co-owner of Cobra Kayaks, but were told that the press release statement was the only comment the company was making. Questions pertaining to apparent continuation of the case and not an overturn as Cobra had portrayed it in the company press release were not answered.

Mark Harmon, director of sales for Ocean Kayak, told us that, "Although the most recent ruling in this case was disappointing, the case is far from over."

Harmon also pointed out that Ocean Kayak holds 64 claims defining and protecting the Malibu II design and that while Cobra sought only to have four of the 64 claims (related to three separate patents all covering the Malibu II design) presented for summary judgment, Cobra is still subject to the Federal District Court, Oregon injunction prohibiting the manufacture and sale of infringing product, as well as to infringement proceedings with respect to the other 60 claims.

SNEWS View: It's a bit premature for Cobra (Glenwa company) to be dancing in the aisles, claiming victory and sending out press releases. Essentially, Cobra is banking that a wave-ski, named the Raider Double, and produced back in 1987, well before the Ocean patent, or the 1994 debut of the Malibu, will be ultimately determined to exist as prior art in the court's eyes. If the wave-ski is admitted as prior art, our legal eagles tell us, Ocean will have much rougher waters to paddle if the company wishes to continue to defend its patents. The Oregon court originally said that the wave-ski is not the same kind of boat or hull design, therefore, it can't be considered as prior art. The court in D.C. said not so fast, and suggested as only a higher court can that the lower court reconsider with a more open mind. Clearly, Cobra thinks it has won. Ocean doesn't. The lawyers get to fight it out making buckets of money, which raises prices -- all over foot wells essentially. Are we missing something here or is the paddlesport industry so large that spending years in court defending a patent over a boat becomes worth it? After all, Cobra is still selling its sit-on-tops, albeit with different seat designs. Meanwhile, cases against both Confluence and Hobie remain stayed pending final resolution of this case. Watermark, though, still a very interested observer, settled with Ocean in 2000.

Related

Federal Judge Rules In Favor Of Ocean Kayak Against Cobra

Ocean Kayak's relentless pursuit of those the company feels have infringed on its patents bore fruit earlier this week. In a judgment handed down in Federal District Court in Portland, Ore., it was deemed that as a matter of law Ocean Kayak's Malibu Two patent is valid. The Oct. ...read more

Federal Judge Rules In Favor Of Ocean Kayak Against Cobra

Ocean Kayak's relentless pursuit of those the company feels have infringed on its patents bore fruit earlier this week. In a judgment handed down in Federal District Court in Portland, Ore., it was deemed that as a matter of law Ocean Kayak's Malibu Two patent is valid. The Oct. ...read more

Cobra Kayak and Ocean Kayak, round two

Cobra Kayaks and Ocean Kayak are engaged in what might become one of the longest running legal ping-pong games we've witnessed in years. As you may recall only a few weeks ago, one District Court judge ruled that two Cobra Kayak models "indisputably infringe" upon an Ocean Kayak ...read more

Did you hear?... Cobra Kayaks and Ocean Kayak engaged in a legal ping-pong game

Cobra Kayaks and Ocean Kayak are engaged in what might become one of the longest running legal ping-pong games we've witnessed in years. As you may recall only a few weeks ago, one District Court judge ruled that two Cobra Kayak models "indisputably infringe" upon an Ocean Kayak ...read more

Ocean Kayaks Wins One, Goes After Another

llllllooooooWe reported in September 2000 about Ocean Kayak's suit against Watermark for patent infringement on its Malibu Two and Cabo sit-on-top kayaks. Because of the pending suit, Watermark's Islander division did not show any of its Festiva kayaks at Outdoor Retailer Summer ...read more

Did you hear?... Cobra Kayaks has new licensing partnership with Cobra Kayaks East

Cobra Kayaks has a new licensing partnership with Cobra Kayaks East. Under the agreement, Cobra Kayaks East will open up an East Coast division that will be run autonomously. Using Cobra molds, the new division will produce, market, and distribute Cobra kayaks and provide ...read more

Johnson Outdoors claims pre-trial victory against Confluence

Judge Donald Ashmanskas of the Federal District Court in Portland, Ore., issued a pre-trial ruling that appears to support the position Johnson Outdoors has taken in the company's patent infringement lawsuit against Confluence, filed on Jan. 24, 2002. In his ruling, Judge ...read more

Nautilus appeals Icon non-infringement legal victory to federal court

Not willing to give up on the nearly 3-year-old patent infringement case, Nautilus has appealed the lower court victory given to Icon in late May to the federal appellate court. After the win was handed to Icon in May when the court dismissed the case (click here to see the ...read more

Glenwa wins big against Johnson, but…

A long-awaited March 19 ruling handed down by the Oregon Federal District Court in Johnson Outdoors' three-year-long patent infringement battle against Glenwa (Cobra Kayaks) found in favor of Glenwa on all counts. The Oregon court upheld a Jan. 14, 2003, ruling by the U.S. Court ...read more