BD makes no bones about protecting its patents - SNEWS

BD makes no bones about protecting its patents

Black Diamond, never a company to take potential patent infringement lightly, filed a lawsuit in the Utah District Court on March 22, 2004, alleging that Trango's new MaxCam, debuted at Winter Market 2004, infringed on BD's patent 4,643,377, more commonly known as the Camalot patent.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

Black Diamond, never a company to take potential patent infringement lightly, filed a lawsuit in the Utah District Court on March 22, 2004, alleging that Trango's new MaxCam, debuted at Winter Market 2004, infringed on BD's patent 4,643,377, more commonly known as the Camalot patent.

That lawsuit put the brakes on Trango's plans to begin shipping the MaxCam this year. After a flurry of legal briefs, the two sides met for an all-day arbitration meeting and on May 21, reached an agreement that stipulates Trango will pay Black Diamond a licensing fee for the rights to produce the MaxCam. In addition, Trango agreed to delay production of the Max -- which includes distributing press releases, undertaking advertising, showing the prototype, showing the product, etc. -- until January 1, 2005. As part of the agreement, Trango did not admit to any patent infringement.

Peter Metcalf, Black Diamond's CEO told SNEWS® that the company is in no way singling out Trango. In fact, he sent a letter to all "major cam players" reminding them that the Camalot patent was still in effect and would be defended.

In the letter, Metcalf stated, "I am sending this letter as a courtesy to underscore that Black Diamond will rigorously enforce the Camalot patent until its expiration in the U.S. in September 2005 and in Europe approximately a year later. I know that many companies have developed facsimiles or variations on the Camalot and are anxious to proceed to market with them."

Metcalf goes on to warn that litigation is "a costly and time consuming business" and that "any company seeking an early introduction while the Camalot patent remains in force would realize that the consequences undermine any perceived benefits."

SNEWS® View: Patent law is very clear on the subject of infringement, defining potential infringements for which damages may be sought as any offer for sale, which includes discussion and reviews in the media, as well as displays of the product and circulation of promotional material at tradeshows. There is little gray area there. BD did not waste any time pulling the trigger on Trango's new MaxCam design, and we're sure the gun is loaded and ready to fire again if BD feels the need. You can be sure that once the patent does expire over here though, there will be a flood of designs, all variations on the twin axle cam known as the Camalot.  

Related

Vectra continues to protect patent in courts

With five patent-infringement cases currently before the courts and others constantly being negotiated outside of the courts, Vectra never stops protecting its 14-year-old patent vigorously, whether the defendant is big or small. "The real truth is, people rip you off from Day ...read more

Avocet Sports Technology files patent infringement lawsuit against Suunto and Amer

Avocet Sports Technology and Vertical Instruments, both based in Northern California, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Amer Sports and its subsidiary, Suunto USA, for alleged patent infringement. The lawsuit, filed on ...read more

Yakima Products adds Hollywood and Rocky to a growing list of alleged patent infringers

In addition to the two lawsuits against Saris and Inno that SNEWS® reported on Nov. 19 (click here to read), Yakima Products filed two more lawsuits in the Oregon District Court, also on Nov. 13, alleging patent infringement against Hollywood Racks based in Los Angeles, Calif., ...read more

EK patent infringement lawsuit against Chisco takes a curious turn

On March 28, SNEWS® received a notification email from EK Ekcessories announcing the company had filed a lawsuit on March 18, 2005, in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah against Chisco Sports Accessories for alleged patent infringement of the company's utility and ...read more

Web Extras: Functional Trainers -- Patent Protection

By John Agoglia For the complete story, see GearTrends® Fitness 2005, p. 34, "A New Dimension" Courting functionThrough the work of founder Roy Simonson – it didn't hurt being first to market either -- FreeMotion Fitness has accumulated eight patents for its technology and on ...read more

Daniel_Fang_wSnowshoe_sm.jpg

Chinese exhibitors hit with patent infringement papers at Summer Market

For a while, it appeared the only paper a number of Chinese exhibitors were going to be dealing with during Outdoor Retailer Summer Market was of the legal variety, not the buying kind. Both Cascade Designs and Petzl took aggressive, although slightly divergent, approaches in ...read more

Nautilus sues rival Icon over Bowflex patent violation claims

The Nautilus Group has charged rival equipment maker Icon Health & Fitness with Bowflex patent infringement by Icon's Weider Crossbow machine, taking the complaint to court in a lawsuit filed last week. "We will absolutely defend our assets and patents as due course of our ...read more

Nautilus sues Keys for alleged indoor cycle infringement

A complaint filed Dec. 22 in the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Nautilus Inc. alleges Keys Fitness has infringed several patents owned by Nautilus related to indoor exercise bikes. The complaint, which requests a jury trial, stated that Keys infringed on three ...read more

Precor sues Fitness Quest, Sportcraft claiming patent infringement

Precor will be giving the courts a little more to do in the coming months. Along with its licensor, Larry Miller, Precor has filed two patent infringement suits against both Fitness Quest and Sportcraft for allegedly infringing on its 10-year-old elliptical patent. “While we ...read more